Jump to content

OmegaKnight

Provisional Member
  • Content Count

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

OmegaKnight last won the day on July 29 2015

OmegaKnight had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

121 Excellent

About OmegaKnight

  • Rank
    The bannerman
  • Birthday 09/30/1994
  1. Dark times when someguy dosent get a copypasta, especially a fairly old one Yeah, but you know, the average faggot knows only ""god is dead", lul, religion roasted", trying to correct them can be frustrating, since explaining philosophy take some time to explain and not many can be bothered to listen. Even if i was an actual nazi, it would still be a joke lol, based on the copypasta and all.
  2. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the Third Reich. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of german history most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Goebbels nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Nietzsche literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike the Third Reich truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in right wing trolls existential catchphrase "Gas the kikes," which itself is a cryptic reference to Richard Wagner Der Ring des Nibelungen. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated untermensch scratching their heads in confusion as Adolf Hitler genius wit unfolds itself on their country. What fools.. how I pity them. And yes, by the way, i DO have an SS tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're pure aryan breed beforehand. Nothin personnel kid
  3. OmegaKnight

    So...

    I could see ubi working only in a completly automated society, but even then, theres gonna need a way to make the concept itself of economy obsolete, finite resources for (virtually) infinite people. Im afraid that the end of capitalism will mean the end of western society as we know it, mostly becouse i dont see any way for a relative peaceful transition.
  4. OmegaKnight

    So...

    In short? never. Natives, black communities will never be successfull into white countries, for the most part, they end up on poverty/borderline poverty, and blame wypipol for action of their ancestors, which did nothing but do what every human was doing (war and conquest) but better. The current victimhood of minorities is a bottomless pit of money and rights, and ironically, will lead to nothing but bitterness from the unwillingly givers and entitlement from the recievers, seeing their request satisified and thus further enforcing the victim status. In time, trough decades, this system ended into making welfare mandatory for countless people. And i can only imagine what would happen if the cash flow would suddendly stop, its pretty scary if you think about it for a moment. Ironically, it was the unfair set of rule that allowed "problematic" groups to thrive; people were kept in line by a stricter police, and without assistence from the state individuals had to make their lives on their own, some by working hard, some by crime, but now, with free GIBS, they can survive without working, and is easier to steal stuff that work to pay it. Well, that was only the tip of the iceberg, but i guess that cronysm corporatism, retirment shares, increase of bureaucracy, , delocalization of low tier jobs+exploitation of immigrants, increased state spendings and diploma/university degree inflation really screwed up the job market, and with it, the buying power of anyone but the higher class.
  5. OmegaKnight

    So...

    No, that only happens in westernized countries, collective good means nothing to africans or most asians, they re still heavily collectivists, but just becouse of natural in-group preferences, and even then its mostly dog eat dog mentality, especially in China. If by collective in their thinking you mean "sticking with your kind and fuck everyone else" (and with kind i mean race), yeah, almost for sure.If you think you can make an agreement between blacks, latinos and caucasians in time of strife, you re being very naive. I d rather not have the big daddy government taking more and more of my money to pump it into corrupted inefficient bureacrocy or shitty healthcare or giving it to welfare leeches and promoting constant immigration (which will burden the nation even more). Yeah, keep slaving away for pointless trinkets and baubles, keep outsourcing jobs for extra money, create a gigantic ponzi scheme to make your sons pay for your living after the economy got fucked, be a good goy. Mindless consumism=extreme greed. Bad wording on my part, normalizing degeneracy would be a better substitute, but it seemed too aggressive
  6. OmegaKnight

    So...

    Mindless consumism, erosion of traditional values (marriage, gender roles) and socialization of expenses (healthcare and welfare for all leeches) will claim its toll on every society, it takes time, but indulging in decadence and going against natural inclinations will always backfire.
  7. Welp, i voted before reading that it was aimed at yankees and leafs. Still, im going to get some rifles (hunting classification) and maybe a handgun the moment i have enough $$$ to get the license.
  8. Bump for forum superiority, make way for the superior media, hail diplo. Since we re at it, can we get the mighty rating bar back? k thx.
  9. What the fug, my computer was fried for 2 weeks, now im back to see whats going on and everything is fucked. This is truly the darkest timeline [ATTACH=full]8890[/ATTACH]
  10. England has decided to adpot "Orwell 1984" as the new book of law
  11. Wont happen, since women make half of the voters, the moment a thing start to get in favour of men, you can see what happens when 50% of the popoulation will be against you just by principle.
  12. The hilarious part was about the chinese claiming victory while not achieving any stated objective, suffering disproportional losses and getting driven out. You have to go back to 1600 and see them slaughtering russians in manchuria to find a war where they beaten a foreign power, and you can hardly call a war slaughtering unarmed peasants. Every war with china goes the same: china rushes the enemy with countless screaming soldiers. A lot of their soldiers get slaughtered while infliciting laughable losses to the enemy, china retreats in defeat, then announce they won. The boxers are another great example of china mastery of the art of war: almost no firearm and no preparation at all, they honestly tought kung-fu magic would have granted em victory against white men with machine guns, but they ended just killing a lot of their own countryman "tainted" by western influence. When it finally came to battle they got their shit kciked in by a handful of europeans and japanese. After that, china got ass-raped by a country with less than a tenth of its population, TWICE. They were only saved by america pacific campaign. Then the commies took the opportunity to get some land in manchuria which would have led to the rise of the communist party in china. Then korea happens, where china sent more troops than all the international support corps to SK combined, where they took overwhelming losses and pulled out of the war. At the battle of chosin reservoir, china had surrounded an emrican unit and outnumbered it 40 to 1. American broke out and destroyed 40% of all the chinese military strenght in korea. humiliating china in the progress. As we know, the war ended with a ceasefire to this day, 'murica wins and china get shit on, again. Now we get to a pointed out 'Nam. America keep killing charlie everywhere, but cant end the war becouse cowards at home didnt want to invade cambodia or north vietnam. Eventually, america pulled out becouse of the homefront, not becouse of any military losses, NV didnt have a chance to invade the south as long as the us had great forces there. Then ofc china decide to invade vietnam, and the entire war lasted less than a month. China, massively outnumbers vietnam, a country exhausted after decades of constant war. China invaded with 6 to 1 numerical superiority and suffered more casualities than vietnamese people, lost more than 400 tanks (against 185 viet tanks). China retreats leaving vietnam in control of cambodia, the spratly islands and everything else that they reclaimed. China claim they won to this day and that they are the owners of the isles. China got destroyed by the mongols, then the japanese, then the french, then the british, then the germans, then the japanese again, maybe even by the russian, then the americans and south korea, then the vietnamese. Heck, even India managed to trade blows with them. Their tactics are shit and consist of human wave assaults, which sucks agasint fortifications, machine guns, artillery, armor, air support and basically anything that isnt bunch of savages like the hundred thosuands of screaming chinese rushing at you. Even with access to modern equipment, they still dont get it, they recieved modern underwear just in 2016, before they had those crude cotton underwear help up with a rope. China is a major exporter of body armor but their army has never been issued so much as a flak vest, even their food rartions are awful to the point that many soldiers wont eat them.
  13. Disappearing for a year to keep diplo alive
  14. True, and the chinese still claimed victory, hilarious. Im pretty sure those guys have lost every significant war they had in their last 400 years, despite every advantage you can imagine.
×
×
  • Create New...