Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Baledwyr

Australia comes under fire for refugee policy

Recommended Posts

0,,16355488_401,00.jpg

 

Date 08.12.2012

Author Charlotta Lomas

Editor Gregg Benzow

 

The Australian government’s tough stance on asylum seekers is failing to deter boat arrivals, as record numbers are hitting Australian shores. Rights groups have criticized the government’s asylum seeker policy.

 

Australia's new "no advantage" policy on asylum seekers was announced on August 13, 2012, and specifies that "any irregular maritime arrivals" after that date are to be sent to the remote Pacific islands of Nauru and Papua New Guinea's Manus Island.

 

The government's policy aims to deter asylum seekers from making the boat journey from Indonesia to Australia. Specifically, it seeks to prevent further drownings, in light of the deaths of nearly 1,000 people en route to Australia since 2001.

 

But the government's approach has drawn criticism, and a record number of almost 8,000 asylum seekers have arrived since the announcement was made in August.

 

Given the limited capacity of offshore holding centers for refugees, the increased number of arrivals has forced the government to release asylum seekers into the community on temporary visas - with no employment rights and limited financial assistance.

 

"Some people will be processed in Australia and processed in the community, but will remain on bridging visas, even after they are regarded, through the process, as refugees," said Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Chris Bowen to reporters in Sydney.

 

Australia's boat people

 

 

The issue of asylum seekers has long been controversial in Australia. When the current Labor Party government came to power in 2007, it abolished the former Liberal government's Pacific Solution policy of offshore processing. Now, the government is sending asylum seekers back there.

 

The new approach follows an earlier attempt by the government last year to send asylum seekers to Malaysia, which was challenged in Australia's High Court, and ultimately declared illegal. A central figure in the High Court challenge, executive director of the Refugee Immigration Legal Centre (RILC) David Manne, says the government isn't upholding its international obligations.

 

"The no advantage test is completely incompatible with international principles and practices when it comes to refugee protection, and is punishing the very people it should be protecting," Manne said in an interview with DW.

 

Most of the maritime asylum seekers in Australia come from countries such as Sri Lanka, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, where they say they face persecution if sent home.

 

In recent weeks, the government has deported 426 Sri Lankans involuntarily, and some voluntarily, bringing the total number of deportations to 525 since August 13. The government posits the voluntarily returns as proof that its new policy is working.

 

'A recipe for disaster'

 

4,000 kilometers (2,485 miles) north of Sydney, frustrations among the detainees on Nauru is mounting. The government has said it could take up to five years for their claims to be processed.

 

Asylum seekers at both island facilities are currently hunger striking in protest at their detention. 26-year-old Muhammed Sayad from Afghanistan, who was on his 12th day of a hunger strike after being detained on Nauru for two months, told DW that the situation is getting worse. He says some detainees are engaging in self-harm.

 

"The guys are hurting themselves because of the stress and injustice. They're using blades, cigarettes, and pulling out their nails," he said.

 

Human rights groups have described the conditions at Nauru as cruel. Amnesty International Australia described men sleeping in tents of up to 14 people with temperatures as high as 40 degrees Celsius amid intense humidity.

 

Amnesty International Australia's refugee spokesperson Alex Pagliaro, who visited the center last month, said she was concerned for the welfare for the detainees, particularly after one attempted suicide was reported while she visited the center.

 

"These men are desperately worrying about their future, terrified about what's happening to their families back home, and also trying to cope with their own experiences of trauma and torture they fled from. It's a recipe for disaster," she said.

 

The government intends to accommodate 1,500 people at Nauru and 500 at Manus Island. Departmental spokesman Sandi Logan claims that permanent detention centers “are still a long way off,†but that the temporary centers have the necessary facilities to accommodate the detainees.

 

The politics of refugees

 

An expert panel on refugees reports that close to 90 percent of asylum seekers coming to Australia are found to be genuine refugees.

 

Australia receives relatively few refugees compared to other nations. In 2011, it received just 2.5 percent of global asylum claims, including both maritime and aircraft arrivals, according to the report. However, the government has committed to increasing Australia's refugee intake from 13,000 to 20,000 per year.

 

The move to send asylum seekers offshore is regarded by refugee advocates as largely a political. RILC's David Manne believes the no advantage policy was born out of a toxic political environment.

 

"There continues to be a contest between the major political parties over who can have the harsher policies toward innocent, vulnerable people coming to Australia and seeking asylum," he said.

 

Nauru detainee Sayad says he cannot understand why the government has sent him to Nauru when other asylum seekers have been released into the community.

 

"My life was in danger - that's why I left. It's not fair that we're being treated this way. This is not a solution. We are requesting that they please, please stop using us for politics," Sayad said.,

 

http://www.dw.de/australia-comes-under-fire-for-refugee-policy/a-16439189

 

Personal Comment From Bors:

 

This is honestly the biggest fucken distraction issue that shouldn't be as important as it is. Just fucken process em and let em in, I've over hearing about it. Both parties are stupid over this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you really have to post this? this issue pisses me off so much.....

And to your Personal comment, you do realise we have to pay for them to live in Australia?

 

They should go back to their bloody own country we already have to pay the highest electricity in the world we also have to pay all our bills and we have to pay for them to live? Fuck no.

Im sick of the bullshit with Asylum Seekers why won't the government just grow some balls and send them back to where they came from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They should go back to their bloody own country we already have to pay the highest electricity in the world we also have to pay all our bills and we have to pay for them to live? Fuck no.

 

You have an unemployment rate of 5.2% and a minimum wage of $16 an hour.

 

Sorry to hear how tough you lot have it in Australia, will gift you 3 steam games of your choice for Christmas

xxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you really have to post this? this issue pisses me off so much.....

And to your Personal comment, you do realise we have to pay for them to live in Australia?

 

They should go back to their bloody own country we already have to pay the highest electricity in the world we also have to pay all our bills and we have to pay for them to live? Fuck no.

Im sick of the bullshit with Asylum Seekers why won't the government just grow some balls and send them back to where they came from.

 

This. I completely agree with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These refugees are not comming through the proper channels Grunty that's the problem their being smuggled.

 

The proper way is through our refugee program .every year the Australian government sponsors 8000 refugees who come from UN run refugee camps from around the world.

 

These people pay people smugglers run by criminal gangs thousands of dollars to try reach Australian shores.they put these people on non sea worthy fishing vessels(the smugglers don't care they don't go on the boats them selves they hire instead pour fishermen who the get arrested on arrival )

 

Thus far 800 people (thats recored deaths probably countless more )have drowned over the past 5 years

It is unhumane and un ethical to support these people however bad there situation . We must reduce the carrot increase the stck to stop the illicit trade of people smuggling.

 

This of course is a hard possion to take my grandfather was a refugee .But he arrived on a decent boat not run by smugglers

 

Personaly i would like us to increase the quota of refugees we sponsor to 20-30 thousands a year. At the same time as toughening our borders to reduce smuggling.

"..........

 

Sorry if this is grammatically bad it's hard typing on a iPad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or bring back The Howard Government's protection visa scheme? What about the 26,000 (likely as not more now) people who are here illegally on over stayed tourist and student visas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...